Poison/Dragon

[pokefan13]

Apr 30, 2009 23:25:01 GMT -5 killerchaos said:

Spiritomb is not a legendary. Rotom is not a legendary. They are both obtained as ONLY Pokemon, and so can this one. Choose to keep the 3 prevos or choose to keep Vendra and mate. He doesn't have to be legendary status in order to be caught in a unique way.

Hmmmmm.... Your right. I forgot about that.
I still don't like it, really.

[KillingEdge]

Apr 30, 2009 22:39:12 GMT -5 killerchaos said:

And, KE, I really don't like your idea. We already have a Bug legend, we don't need a Bug/Dragon, unless we need a Yanma split-evo, but then it wouldn't be legendary.

Yes, me not liking KE's ideas, it's a shocker. But seriously, KE, that idea is bad, considering we have too many legends as is.

Millitusk isn't a legendary, it's a pseudo-legend. The only actual legendary Pokemon in our Dex so far is Cryohm.

[pokefan13]

But Vendigrave should be accepted for the remake version. And like I said, we don't want a million legendaries like in D/P/Pt

[KillingEdge]

Here's what I think should work.

- The weaker legendary trio. (The birds, the dogs, the Regis, etc...)
- The flagship legendary trio.

Actually, that sounds about right. Perhaps I'll just work on making two more mini-legendaries to form a trio with Cryohm, then Frosvetr can be Armagonex's counterpart, as killer said.

And why all the shock and awe at me having a not-so-good idea? I'm only human. >_>

[pokefan13]

Frosvetr should be a counter part to Armagonex. What do you think of it just as it is now, KE?

[ninplayer]

So far, I'm liking the idea of having this generations' legend trio being something like Poison/Dragon, Bug/Dragon, and...Fighting/Dragon?

[pokefan13]

Like I said, I'm not sure this should be a legendary. Maybe an Aura/Dragon or Dark/Dragon?

[ninplayer]

But we could make it a legendary because we can.

[pokefan13]

I'm still not sure

[pokefan13]

So really, I would rather have it as it is... if possible.

[ninplayer]

Then we'll just go ahead and make our own Poison/Dragon. Not too hard.

[pokefan13]

Three Poison/Dragons? That sounds abnormal.

[ninplayer]

Yours won't be accepted.

What's better for the project is more important than what one member wants

[pokefan13]

How would your idea better for the project? I created mine so there could be another posion type, which is one of the types we are trying to improve, I if I'm not mistaken. All your idea does is take my typing idea and just make it a legendary. And if I'm not mistaken, you and KE are the only ones who really want there to be a legendary dragon trio. And even though you both are the only ones to accept pokemon, its better if most of us agree. That would be better for the project. And what's better for the project is more important than what two people want.

If you get three more people to agree with the legendary trio made up of dragon types, I'll make this a legendary for this dragon legendary trio. But if you don't, I won't make this a legendary. And I don't think it would be fair if then you just made a Posion/Dragon when I already have a good one just so it can fit YOUR liking.

[ninplayer]

Too bad KE and I are the only ones who have the authority to accept, lawl.

Good for you if you don't make it a legend. We can make it a legend anyhow.

Stop trying to flame and doing horribly at it.